Tweeten is undoubtedly the most powerful platform for GIF lovers that embeds a built-in search feature for GIFs. GIFs are the short and best response to the asked questions with a bit of sense of humor. I don’t think there is anyone who doesn’t like GIFs.
TWEETEN REVIEW DOWNLOAD
A few features that are added in Tweeten include download videos, touch bar, schedule tweets, emoji picker, seamless updates, and classic app has some or the other USP that becomes its identity and the same way, Tweeten’s USP is “ GIF videos”. Since Tweeten is based on the same concept of TweetDeck, the app is a bit more advanced with more features embedded. Please know that not only you can see the latest updates on Tweeten, but you can also use this platform including profile changes, posting new things, making edits, or scheduling tweets as well. If you don’t like hard domes or have a limited budget, go for the Textile version.Tweeten helps you get most of the updates without losing time and enhances your social media platform experience. If you want the “top of the line”, something exotic and isn’t cost-sensitive, go for the Beryllium. Out of the box the Beryllium doesn’t sound impressive at all, but after about 24 hours they start to loosen up and deliver nice performance and my guess is that they over time will continue to improve.īoth these tweeters are world-class performers. This might change over time because the Beryllium tweeter seems to need some significant time to burn-in, compared to the Textile tweeter. The Beryllium tweeter is a bit more analytic in its character than the Textile dome, which in turn is a bit more forgiving sounding on the less good recorded albums. I personally isn’t a huge fan of hard dome tweeters, but the ScanSpeak Beryllium dome tweeter is definitely the best one I’ve so far have listened to. I would say it’s more of a personal taste, metal versus soft dome tweeter.
TWEETEN REVIEW DRIVER
The Beryllium tweeter has lower distortion throughout the driver unit usable frequency range, compared to the Textile tweeter.The Textile dome tweeter has about 7dB higher output at 20kHz.The Textile dome tweeter has an upwards rising frequency response from 13kHz.The Beryllium tweeter has a downwards sloping frequency response from 13kHz.The Beryllium tweeter has a small frequency dip centered at 8.5kHz that might be caused by the metal protective grill.The Beryllium tweeter has a sharper and higher impedance peak at the driver resonance frequency.The Beryllium tweeter has about 0.5dB lower sensitivity and slightly higher impedance than the Textile tweeter.The Beryllium tweeter costs roughly 2 ½ times more than the Textile tweeter.The D3004/664000 tweeter dome diaphragm is made of 99% Beryllium, versus the D3004/660000 is made of a Textile dome diaphragm.They have the same frequency level at 30kHz.They have almost the same frequency response up to 13kHz.They have the same resonance frequency and DC resistance.They have the same voice-coil and effective cone area.They appear to share the same AirCirc motor system with 6 Neodymium magnet slugs.They have the same die-cast rubber painted aluminium faceplate.The frequency dip at 3.5kHz is caused by baffle diffraction and is evened out with increased off-axis angle. Red = The ScanSpeak D3004/664000 1” Beryllium dome.īlue = The ScanSpeak D3004/660000 1” Textile dome. Normalized, Tweeter On-axis (0deg) 1m measurement: Green = The ScanSpeak D3004/660000 1” Textile dome. In this blog post I will try to sort out my findings in the subject! ?īlue = The ScanSpeak D3004/664000 1” Beryllium dome. Right: The ScanSpeak D3004/664000 1” Beryllium dome. Left: The ScanSpeak D3004/660000 1” Textile dome. What are the similarities and differences the between the ScanSpeak D3004/660000 1” Textile dome versus the D3004/664000 1” Beryllium dome, besides the price tag?